Some time
ago, on my radio show, I talked about
Dr. Richard Day coming out and speaking about population control and reduction.
Dr. Day did this in 1969. Some of the points he made to attain that goal are
coming to fruition.
Is there a power, a force or a
group of men organizing and redirecting change?
There
has been much written, and much said, by some people who have looked at all the
changes that have occurred in American society in the past 50 years or so, and
who have looked retrospectively to earlier history of the United States, and
indeed, of the world, and come to the conclusion that there is a conspiracy of
sorts which influences, indeed controls. major historical events, not only in the
United States, but around the world.
This
conspiratorial interpretation of history is based on people making observations
from the outside, gathering evidence and coming to the conclusion that from the
outside they see a conspiracy. Their evidence and conclusions are based on
evidence gathered in retrospect. Period. I want to now describe what was said
in 1969.
Dr.
Day did not speak in terms of retrospect, but rather predicted changes that
would be brought about in the future. He was not looking from the outside in,
thinking that he saw conspiracy, rather, he was on the inside, admitting that,
indeed, there was an organized power, force, group of men, who wielded enough
influence to determine major events involving countries around the world. And
he predicted, or rather expounded on, changes that were planned for the remainder
of this century.
Some of the things that were discussed were
not intended to be accomplished before the end of this century. There is a
timetable; and it was during this session that some of the elements of the
timetable were brought out.
Anyone
who recalls early in the days of the Kennedy Presidency, the Kennedy campaign,
when he spoke of progress in the decade of the 60’s that was kind of a cliché
in those days. Well, by 1969 Day was talking about the decade of the 70’s, the
decade of the 80’s, and the decade of the 90’s. So that the terminology that we
are looking at, looking at things and expressing things, probably all comes
from the same source.
Prior
to that time nobody referred to the decade of the 40’s or the decade of the
50’s. So, this overall plan and timetable had taken
important shape with more predictability to those who control it, sometime in
the late 50’s.
Day’s
purpose was to tell us about changes which would be brought about in the next
30 years or so…so that an entirely new world-wide system would be in
operation before the turn of the century. As he put it, “We plan to enter the 21st
Century with a running start.”
“EVERYTHING
IS IN PLACE AND NOBODY CAN STOP US NOW…”
He said, “Some of you will
think I’m talking about Communism. Well, what I’m talking about is much bigger
than Communism!”
At that time, he indicated that
there is much more cooperation between East and West than most people realize.
In his introductory remarks he commented that he was free to speak at this
time. He would not have been able to say what he was about to say, even a few
years earlier. But he was free to speak at this time because now,
“everything is in place and nobody can stop us now.”
He went on to say that most people don’t
understand how governments operate and even people in high positions in
governments, including our own, don’t really understand how and where decisions
are made. He went on to say that people who really influence decisions are
names that for the most part would be familiar to most of us, but he would not
use individuals’ names or names of any specific organization. But, if he did,
most of the people would be names that were recognized by most of his audience.
He went on to say that they were not primarily people in public office, but
people of prominence who were primarily known in their private occupations or
private positions.
Day was an MD and a former professor
at a large Eastern university, and he was addressing a group of doctors of
medicine, about 80 in number. His purpose in telling the group about the
imminent changes that were to be brought about was to make it easier for .them
to adapt to these changes.
“PEOPLE WILL
HAVE TO GET USED TO CHANGE…”
Somewhere
in his introductory remarks he insisted that nobody have a tape recorder and
that nobody take notes, which for a professor was a very remarkable kind of
thing to expect from an audience. Something in his remarks suggested that there
could be negative repercussions against him if it became widely known what he
was about to say. Nonetheless, he asked
that no notes be taken and no tape recordings be used.
As
his remarks began to unfold, and the outrageous things that were said, he
emphasized that people will have to get used to the idea of change, that
they’ll be expecting change.
He
said nothing will be permanent and this came out in the context of a society
where people seemed to have no roots or moorings, but would be passively
willing to accept change simply because it was all they had ever known.
This
was sort of in contrast to generations of people up until this time where
certain things you expected to be, and remain in place as reference points for
your life. So change was to be brought about, change was to be anticipated and
expected, and accepted, no questions asked.
Another
comment that was made was that people are too trusting and don’t ask the right
questions.
Being
too trusting was equated with being too dumb. But sometimes when people don’t
ask the right questions, they deserve what they get.
THE REAL AND THE
STATED GOALS
Another comment that was repeated
from time to time, in relation to changing laws and customs and specific
changes, he said that everything has two purposes. One is the ostensible
purpose, which will make it acceptable to people and second is the real purpose
which would further the goals of establishing the new system and having it.
POPULATION
CONTROL
He
was very active with population control groups, the population control
movement, and population control was really the entry point into specifics
following the introduction. He said the population is growing too fast. Numbers
of people living at any one time on the planet must be limited or we will run
out of space to live. We will outgrow our food supply and we will over-populate
the world with our waste.
PERMISSION TO
HAVE BABIES
People won’t be allowed to have
babies just because they want to or because they are careless. Most families
would be limited to two. Some people would be allowed only one, and the
outstanding person or persons might be selected and allowed to have three.
But most people would be allowed to
have only two babies. That’s because the zero population growth rate is 2.1
children per completed family. So something like every 10th family might be
allowed the privilege of the third baby.
The word “population control
primarily connoted limiting the number of babies to be born. But this remark
about what people would be “allowed” and then what followed, made it
quite clear that when you hear “population control” that means more
than just controlling births. It means control of every endeavor of an entire
world population
Sources:
The post Is population control and reduction a reality? appeared first on NaturalNewsBlogs.
