The introduction of screenings resulted in drops in both metastatic prostate cancer and prostate cancer deaths. However, the benefit of routine screenings was counterbalanced by risks of overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer.

In 2008, the United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF), a leading national organization in disease prevention and evidence-based medicine, recommended against routine PSA screening for men older than 75. This was followed by a recommendation against screening for all men in 2012.

Research shows that prostate cancer screenings for men declined after the recommendations changed across all age groups and racial backgrounds.

Keck Medicine researchers wanted to assess metastatic prostate cancer trends before and after the USPSTF recommendations against screenings.

They identified men 45 and older with a diagnosis of invasive prostate cancer from 2004-2018 through the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) Program cancer incidence database.

From 2004-2018, the last year for which data was available, more than 836,000 prostate cancer patients 45 or older were recorded in the SEER database. Of these, 26,642 cases of metastatic prostate cancer were reported in men 45-74, and 20,507 cases in men 75 or older.

Among the 45-74 age group, the incidence rate of metastatic prostate cancer remained stable during 2004-2010, then increased 41% during 2010-2018. For men 75 and older, the incidence rate decreased in 2004-2011, then increased 43% from 2011-2018. For both age groups, the increases were across all races.

The researchers note that these increases stand in contrast to the decreasing trends in incidence of metastatic prostate cancer between 2004-2009, before the USPSTF stopped recommending routine PSA screenings for men.

The authors also discuss the possibility that other factors besides the change in screening recommendations in 2008 and 2012 could play a role in the uptick in cancer cases, such as the use of new, cutting-edge diagnostic and staging tools that are better able to detect low-volume (less invasive) metastatic prostate cancer.

However, they conclude that such techniques are not widespread, and typically not used for first-time cancer detection, so are unlikely to be of significance in the findings.

“This data is very important as it indicates the need to constantly reassess the impact of policy decisions,” said Giovanni Cacciamani, MD, MSc, co-lead author of the study, an assistant professor of research urology and radiology at the Keck School and an associate member of USC Norris. “Otherwise, we may see a continued rise in metastatic prostate cancer.”

The original concerns for stopping the screenings — that they led to overdiagnosis and overtreatment of low-risk prostate cancer — may also be outdated, say the authors.

“Urologic centers of excellence, including USC Urology, are continually researching ways to leverage technologies to optimize patient outcomes and decrease side effects of treatment,” said Inderbir Gill, MD, chairman of the Catherine and Joseph Aresty Department of Urology, distinguished professor of urology at the Keck School, executive director of the USC Institute of Urology and a member of USC Norris. “More refined strategies, including biomarkers and magnetic resonance imaging, have already increased detection of clinically significant cancers, while active surveillance is increasingly used for low-risk and favorable intermediate-risk disease, thus mitigating the risks of overtreatment.”

Other Keck Medicine study authors include Juanjuan Zhang, a statistician at the Keck School; Lihua Liu, PhD, associate professor of clinical population and public health sciences at the Keck School, director and principle investigator of the SEER Program and a member of USC Norris; and Andre Abreu, MD, a urologist with Keck Medicine who directs the Center for Targeted Biopsies & Focal Therapy at the USC Institute of Urology.

Source: Eurekalert