When
we are talking about the media, it comes down to this question: do they create
the consciousness of the people or is the consciousness of the people merely
being reflected by the media?
The
fact is that practically everyone watches TV and reads the newspapers;
therefore, the media is in a position to influence. They are just as much
leaders of the society as the politicians, schoolteachers, priests, etc.
Sometimes,
when I write letters to the editor or various other editorials, the newspapers
do not print them because it goes against their advertising dollars. Yet, those
who run a newspaper have great influence and are in a very responsible
position, but nonetheless portray things that will benefit them.
The
importance of what we hear from others and what we ourselves are speaking
should be appreciated. What ever I hear or read will have the effect of
confusing and entangling me more and more in materialistic life or it will have
a liberating effect. Therefore, we must be very careful.
In
this light, then, practically everyone in society is acting as a leader or a
guru to others. Even the person who says βyou donβt need to follow anyone;
just go on your ownβ is teaching. His teaching is that you donβt need a
leader or a guru. What this usually means is that you just end up hearing
anyoneβs and everyoneβs opinion.
Not
wanting to hear from anyone because Iβm afraid of being misled is a sign of
complete paranoia. And, acute paranoia is actually another symptom of this age.
The
media is responsible for this to a great extent. By continually showing us how
this madman is trying to start a war; this mad man is eating his followers;
this madman is raping women or this madman is knocking off cops, we started
seeing everyone as a madman and we walk around full of fear.
Actually,
people are too scared to even walk anywhere. The perfect example is Los
Angeles, where people donβt walk anywhere. They drive around in their cars all
shackled up and they run to their doors and lock them. Then they try to remain
alone, but this is not the solution, as it will not make us happy.
There
is really no way I can live in the world without hearing from someone; without
accepting someone as an authority; so it comes down to a question of who should
I hear from?
Everyone
is telling me something different: my parents are telling me this; the
psychiatrists are saying something else; some guy is saying something else
again in a newspaper article. It means, then, that I have to be a little more
thoughtful. I have to analyze the character and motivation of those I am
hearing from.
Of
course, if youβre lazy, this makes it difficult. When everyone is saying
something different, it means I have to make some effort to find out the truth.
Itβs much easier to say everybodyβs got his or her own truth and I donβt need
to worry. But the fact is, there is Absolute Truth and only when I am fixed up
in harmony with that Truth will I be secure and full within myself and able to
benefit others.
Anyone
in a position of influence must be responsible for those he is influencing.
This is a question that could be asked of the media: do they really care for
those they are influencing?
I
am always surprised how politicians are so eager to give leadership to others,
how the media are ready to editorialize everything. Yet, if they were to
examine their own lives, they would see that they are not happy; they donβt
understand the purpose of life. What effect, then, will they have on others? It
gives solid meaning to that old saying that the blind cannot lead the blind.
The
responsibility of a leader is to lead people to a higher level of
consciousness. And he must teach by his own example. His duty is to take a
stand for the protection of society even if it makes him unpopular.
This
is dangerous because the people in turn are followers of the media. The mediaβs
business is catering to peopleβs senses. They are not interested in doing good.
Their main interest is to create markets and make a buck. This is their motive.
By catering to peopleβs senses, they are able to gain control.
The
media, thinking they are the real leaders of society, makes it very difficult
for someone else who is wanting to do good to others, and try and reach people
through the media.
Although
the media has undisputed power to influence peopleβs decisions and they are in
control of the public mind, unfortunately they are for the greater part without
any conscience.
Society
is becoming more and more like animal society. Instead of helping people
advanced toward an understanding of themselves and their relationship with God,
the media and people in power are taking everyone into animal existence not
only here in now, but in the future also.
When
this gross body is finished, then according to oneβs mentality, nature towards
another kind of gross body. What we do, see, and hear now affects the mind or
subtle body, and the subtle body in turn forms the nucleus for the kind of
gross physical body that we take on in the next life.
The
connection between the gross senses and the subtle material body is a science
that must be understood. It can be seen that while the media and advertising
people may not fully appreciate this science, they are aware of how it works
and they use it to control peopleβs minds and exploit them.
Due
to their own lust for material gain and following, they do not use their power
to good effect. They want a society of animals because animals are easier to
control and exploit than intelligent people. This, for example, is the whole
strategy of advertising. Excite peopleβs gross senses and they will buy your
product.
Another
important effect of the media at present is that instead of bringing people to
gather, they have built walls between people.
The
word βmediaβ comes from the word βmediumβ which means transparent like a window. The media is
not meant to get in the way of communication between people. It is meant to be
neutral like a tape recorder.
The
editorial column is actually the correct place for the editorβs particular
viewpoint or angle on things. As soon as the media begins distorting things,
then it no longer qualifies as a medium for anything. It will not be possible
for people to communicate in this way. My words might go through a reporterβs pen, but if
his pen is like a butcherβs knife, cutting out this and that, changing things
around, then he has failed to communicate what I am saying. Instead, he has
presented his own ideas.
Reporters
may make only small changes that seem unimportant; but that, plus the tone or
vibe of their language, go to create a certain kind of picture in peopleβs
minds. This is the danger when people in the media start taking the liberty to
twist the truth.
People
are always feeling alienated from everyone else in society. They are already
small and powerless in the face of the powers that be. The media should not
increase this. They should give people a chance to express what they are really
seeing and feeling. But instead, they increase paranoia and separation. They
create the feeling of βusβ and βthemβ.
During
the Vietnam War, all the magazines and newspapers like to present the Vietcong
as some kind of monolithic, evil force. People didnβt even know they were people, let alone South Vietnamese
people who were fighting against the existing government.
They
used blanket terms like βthe Redsβ and then, of course, they had to
revise their terms later when there was a split between the Russian and Chinese
Communists. In fact, there were people in the nation who tried to suggest it
was just a ploy by the Communists to make βusβ think they were not
one force. The media created in peopleβs minds the idea of vague terms, of
conspiring demons β βall you Reds are alike, all you hippies are alike,
all you cults are alikeβ, etc.
Media
tends to be stuck with this disease of generalizing. And usually they plead
innocence out of stupidity: βWe didnβt even know there was a difference
and even if we did, we couldnβt explain it to people because the people are too
dumb. They donβt want to know all of that. Youβve got to keep it simple and
talk down to them. Itβs easier just to label everyone as a member of this team
or that teamβ.
Reading
the newspaper is like reading the sports page. People picked the page just to
see which side is winning, whether itβs the Arabs, the Jews, the Catholics, the
Commies, or this or that. And there are two kinds of sports pages: local and
international. Some games are played with guns, some with words, some with
political power, etc. Everything is seen like a baseball game or a soccer match.
If
they were to give a less superficial coverage of the things going on, the ideas
involved, it would make things too complicated. You would lose the effect of
the game vibe. People might not pick up the paper anymore. It would no longer
be an easy spectator sport, our team against another team, us against them. It
becomes a whole deeper thing. People have to start thinking.
Itβs
easier for the media to encourage team spirit and get people jacked up on that
feeling. That way they will buy their newspapers and magazines to see if their
team is winning or if the bad guys are taking over weβre coming up the block.
For this reason, the media are always looking for a new angle or conflict, a
new game that people can identify with.
So,
it shows that the mediaβs interest is generally on the basic animal level. They
consider only the animal instincts β eating, sleeping, having sex, defending,
violence, and fear. They donβt understand that we are all on the same team and
that there is no need for animosity.
We
are all spirit souls, parts and parcels of the Supreme. Team spirit springs
from the pack mentality of animal life. It does not spring from any spiritual
tendencies of the soul.
In
many ways, the media is not even in control of itself because it is controlled
by the advertisers, and even the writers are stuck because they are having to
write in a very limited space and they cannot get very deep.
Why
are people not interested in hearing are presenting serious ideas or
philosophy? Because they have become too attached to material sense
gratification. Even though they can be explained to them in very simple,
scientific terms, that they are not the body, and how being bound up in the
material body is a suffering condition enter natural position is being that dominated
part and parcel of God, they cannot understand. In the ancient text, the
Bhagavad-Gita, it states:
βIn the
minds of those who are too attached to sense enjoyment and material opulence,
and who are bewildered by such things, the resolute determination for
devotional service to the Lord does not take placeβ.
Β In other words, ignorance is bliss! So a
person in that condition of being too attached to sense enjoyment does not want
to be in knowledge because the truth will take him away from thinking βI
can only enjoy myself if my senses are fully pleasedβ. If they separate
themselves from the body, they think there is no purpose in life. A person who
is attached to sense enjoyment wants to remain in illusion so he or she can
continue trying to be Master of the world.
Β As soon as we begin talking about us being
spirit soul, the servant of God, a person thinks, βHold on here, what are
you trying to get me intoβ? Nobody wants to be a servant. Everyone wants
to be a master. They want to be glorified. They want the recognition. And if
you go to a party when you get all spiffed up and think you the belle of the
ball and everybody pays attention to the other guy and not to you what happens?
Enviousness! And itβs this enviousness that makes it so a person does not want
to hear about his true identity because then the only conclusion remaining is
that his natural function is to render service to God.
Namaste!
Sources: